tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27037188370800884882024-03-13T15:44:27.531-05:00Little Blog In The Big Woods38 years living "ultra" green- still going. How to. How not to. Why. Why not.Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.comBlogger405125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-86143770418467000192018-07-18T13:06:00.000-05:002018-07-18T14:59:26.878-05:00I'm appalled...Ok, sure, I'm appalled at everything- but at the moment I'm <i>most</i> appalled at discovering that my last post here was in December.... Gad. Sorry about that!<br />
<br />
I have no intention of abandoning you, or this blog. Life, however, has been consistently more difficult than seems strictly necessary for the past months, leaving us all, thee and me, both exhausted and without cheerful conversation material.<br />
<br />
Apparently we will have to make do, conversation-wise, with non-cheerful material for a while. Mostly. So, girding my loins (and I recommend you gird yours also), here is some un-cheerful material from Japan today. Japan, keep in mind, has one of the highest standards of living on the planet, <a href="https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/japan">ranked #5 "Best Country</a>" in the world by <a href="https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries">this source</a>; and scads of money, and people with time on their hands; judging from the abundance and complexity of their festivals. But-<br />
<br />
<h2 class="nw-card__title">
<a href="https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20180718_30/">Nearly 5,000 people in shelters in western Japan</a></h2>
<br />
"More than 10 days after the catastrophic rain that hit mainly western Japan, NHK has learned that the death toll rose to 216 people, with 15 remaining missing, as of Wednesday. NHK reporters say that 4,669 people are still taking shelter at facilities in 15 prefectures.<br />
<br />
"The health ministry says around 55,500 households in Hiroshima, Ehime and Okayama Prefectures were still without running water. Municipality staff and Self-Defense Force personnel are delivering water to communities.<br />
<br />
"The authorities are starting to understand the damage to agriculture and forestry. The agriculture ministry officials say the financial cost to the industries has climbed to about 500 million dollars.<br />
<br />
"Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga told reporters on Wednesday that Japan has received about 220,000 dollars in donations of from China, 180,000 dollars from Taiwan and 150,000 dollars from Thailand. He added other countries, regions and organizations have also expressed sympathy and offered support."<br />
<br />
Japan needs a few hundred thousand dollars in donations from China, Taiwan, and Thailand? They really don't. And 5,000 people still living in school gymnasiums 10 days later? Hm. Pretty lame response, truly. Other infrastructure damage: "Rail freight services have been suspended in wide areas of western Japan ... Japan Freight Railway Company President Koichi Shingai told reporters that full recovery will take more than one month. Shingai said the disaster severely damaged rail services... the disruption has affected supplies of agricultural commodities and paper products. The freight company last week began alternative services by truck and cargo ship that <i>cover only about 13 to 14 percent of normal rail transport volume</i>."<br />
<br />
This has become a pattern; these rains were global-warming spawned record-breakers; nothing like them in their 3,000 year memories. In 2016 Japan had <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Kumamoto_earthquakes">serious earthquakes</a> hit in similar circumstances; and the response from the central government was again, embarrassing. Too little; too late, and still not helping much. The outlying areas are sort of - on their own. Not for lack of money, or resources - but lack of will. Sounding familiar?<br />
<br />
Following the floods - global warming heat wave: "The Fire and Disaster Management Agency says the soaring temperatures currently hitting Japan sent 9,956 people to hospital with heat stroke in the week ending last Sunday. Of them, 12 died... The Meteorological Agency says that scorching heat will continue across Japan until the end of July..." <br />
<br />
And- in case you were wondering - <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-disaster-nuclear-icewall/tepcos-ice-wall-fails-to-freeze-fukushimas-toxic-water-buildup-idUSKCN1GK0SY">The Ice Wall Worketh Not</a>; as I firmly <a href="https://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2016/03/prediction-ice-wall-wont-work.html">predicted here</a>, before it was built. Physics, you know. The "nuclear engineers" still have no idea, 7 years later, how they are going to clean up the leaked, melted, utterly lethal nuclear fuel - nor do they even know where it is. The communities? Gone.<br />
<br />
The ancient observation that "Misery loves company" is not a good guiding principle. But ignoring and forgetting misery, I think, is worse.<br />
<br />
Hang in there. Keep in mind - all your ancestors - were survivors. <br />
<br />
:-)<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-2629069843089558912017-12-07T12:11:00.000-06:002017-12-07T12:11:08.022-06:00Now the REALLY Important News...I was overjoyed today to run across this major news story, by a major news source, The Baltimore Sun: "<a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/features/pets/bal-most-popular-dog-names-in-baltimore-20171207-photogallery.html">Most Popular Dog Names In Baltimore In 2017</a>"<br />
<br />
And with cute puppy photos, too.<br />
<br />
It just really resonated with me; this is the news we all crave, yes? I was a bit appalled to find that two of my dogs have names in the top 10 here; and one of our horses has another... Just goes to show... something.<br />
<br />
Duke Ellington is attributed with saying "There are two kinds of music. Good music, and the other kind."<br />
<br />
We should adopt similar clarity for the news we consume, I think. Puppy names, is good news. We've all had our fill of the other kind.Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-8520553549044475462017-10-03T12:14:00.001-05:002017-10-03T14:35:12.990-05:00Glasses OffHi, Folks. It's not that I have nothing new to say about mass shootings. It's that I've already said 90% of it; <a href="https://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2007/04/screaming-headlines.html">here</a>, and <a href="https://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2014/10/school-shootings-so-you-can-avoid-this.html">here</a>; and what little new I might say is not going to change anything, I may say it, eventually, but if you're like me, the pain and embarrassment of belonging to our species is just a bit much to handle at the moment.<br />
<br />
So - here is an Autumn thing I'd been getting ready to write about for several days now. I was reminded of this odd little quirk when I was inside sitting down and acquiring a bit more caffeine in the middle of the day; and I took my glasses off. This is what I saw out my window:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ie8joztFfr8/WdO6IIw8h5I/AAAAAAAAAdQ/QVWcqIyiMTwbBYkwRkwEmrZ0ny8xUgDPQCLcBGAs/s1600/blurred%2B2174.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1200" data-original-width="1600" height="480" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ie8joztFfr8/WdO6IIw8h5I/AAAAAAAAAdQ/QVWcqIyiMTwbBYkwRkwEmrZ0ny8xUgDPQCLcBGAs/s640/blurred%2B2174.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Actually took quite a bit of work with the camera to get it blurred approximately right. Last time I asked the optometrist what my uncorrected vision was nowadays, the answer was "Oh, around 20/230 at this point. " That's beyond legally blind. I've had glasses since the 3rd grade; so, used to it.<br />
<br />
In general when people see an image like this, the first impulse is to "fix it" - and put it back in focus. But the world looks like this to me any time my glasses are off; so - I still look. Is there something to see? The impressionist blurred fall leaves out my window looked quite lovely to me. A little more than the camera can capture, because there was always a little movement from light wind. Very nice.<br />
<br />
So of course I put my glasses back on, to see what it <i>really</i> looked like - and it looked like nothing at all; the gorgeous display vanished into some sharp separate bits that just did not have any impact. At all.<br />
<br />
Yeah, there's probably a metaphor floating around here somewhere...<br />
<br />
I took the glasses back off, and just settled back and enjoyed the Monet/Van Gogh Autumn. That view is lovely - highly evocative of the season, for me, and "enough", all by itself. Coffee and - perspective; this is reality too. Comfy. Move around a little for a different view and - the whole woods is a landscape out of a museum.<br />
<br />
This made me recall that I have long felt sorry for people with normal vision- because they can't take their glasses off, and see this way. That first struck me when I was quite young, probably in the first year I had glasses. We were putting up the Christmas tree; and I was given the job of crawling under it to adjust the stand a bit- and a wayward branch took my glasses off.<br />
<br />
Looking up through the tree, the world opened up, and the magic expanded manyfold. The tree lights changed into fantasy stars, with scintillating points; the ornaments now reflected the lights with about 50 times the shimmer. I stayed under the tree; on my back, glasses off - until the family started to wonder if I was ok. Then I did have the fun of telling my sister, also a glasses wearer, about the phenomenon. She crawled under, after a lot of convincing; and had the same epiphany. "Ohmylord. It's so much more beautiful!" My brothers - don't wear glasses, and could not understand. <br />
<br />
I've climbed under every Christmas tree, every year, and repeated and recaptured. It's a very durable joy. Normally sighted people can kind of replicate it by squinting so that the eyelashes obscure most of the world - but the squinting part is an effort and intrusive. Us legally blind folk are the lucky ones here.<br />
<br />
Sometimes - the world looks better with your glasses off. It's still the world, and reality - but maybe a little easier on us than all the hard edges. I recommend it.<br />
<br />
<br />
If you're in the mood for a little more escape- and a little more Autumn; these two posts have been popular for a good while -<br />
<br />
<a href="http://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2007/09/turn-of-year.html">The Turn Of The Year</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2007/10/zen-firewood.html">Zen Firewood</a><br />
<br />
<br />
The world still turns.<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-51927734380552671602017-09-09T17:57:00.000-05:002017-09-09T18:03:42.652-05:00Another Iceberg Is Moving... Maybe...<a href="https://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2007/06/pushing-on-icebergs.html">Pushing on icebergs</a> is my metaphor for continuing to work - push - on causes that can seem hopeless. The philosophy behind that choice can be complex, but sometimes the simplest reason to work is - there is nothing to lose by making the effort. Why not keep trying? <br />
<br />
One of the icebergs I push on is "public opinion". Manifestly, public opinion changes, moves. Witness womens' suffrage, prohibition, etc. As well as the consistent swing in voters from one political party to the other. One of the places public opinion brews is in the "newspapers" - though that world has spread widely. But- people looking to express their own opinion, or understand others, very often "read the papers" and read the arguments.<br />
<br />
So I do comment regularly in the New York Times, Washington Post, and a few other places. And if you look around on this blog you will find several posts about my occasional successes, as judged by the number of "likes" my comments can receive. <a href="https://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2016/08/a-little-social-media-request.html">Sometimes a lot of people like</a> what I have to say.<br />
<br />
And sometimes, I can really stick my neck out in these comments; with opinions and facts I know will not be happily received. I just did that yesterday- and - got thoroughly surprised by the results. Pleasantly.<br />
<br />
We're up to our ears in hurricanes and hurricane news at the moment; when along comes the big Mexican earthquake; the strongest in 100 years. So - I decided to go ahead and say publicly something I have avoided saying for years, because most folks would then certainly put me in the whackjob box. Not good if you hope people may actually listen to you, a little.<br />
<br />
Climate change is going to cause earthquakes. Is; will; some of them bigger than we are used to. Everything on the planet is connected- changing sea levels will change the forces working on faults, and some will be pushed over the edge into slipping. Physics. But boy- the few times I have raised the subject in conversations, the rejection was fierce. From all directions.<br />
<br />
I laid it out in the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/08/world/americas/mexico-earthquake.html?&target=comments&hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&modref=HPCommentsRefer&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1">New York Times first coverage</a> of this earthquake. To my astonishment - it was quickly a "New York Times Pick", one of only 9, out of 319 comments so far. The Times staff who do the picking will always pick a few comments running against the trend, so long as they are articulate, so the fact that I was picked doesn't mean the NYT agrees with me. But! To my increasing astonishment - a lot of people DO. My comment is currently ranked #7 out of 200 some, with 195 "recommendations." And; boy; did my comment get a lot of "replies". Mostly of the "shut up you ignorant ass" variety, but not all.<br />
<br />
Here is the comment:<br />
<br />
"<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/08/world/americas/mexico-earthquake.html?&target=comments&hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&modref=HPCommentsRefer&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1#permid=24014465">Greenpa Minnesota 1 day ago</a><br />
<br />
"Ok. Are you listening? Yes, on Planet Earth, EVERYTHING is connected.<br />
<br />
"Earth's crust is made up of enormous blocks of rock- and where the continental "plates" meet, they rub up against each other, and move. How far do they move? They move until all the forces affecting them are "in balance". When those forces change- they will move again. That's called an earthquake. Over geological eons, they move a very great deal; we now know from many kinds of evidence that Africa and South America really did once fit together into one land mass. The 6,000 miles now separating them happened - one earthquake at a time.<br />
<br />
"Most continental plate boundaries are under the oceans. What happens when a fault zone, in balance- now has just a little more ocean on top of it? "Balance" means exactly that- and adding one feather to the other side of a balance can make it shift; no vast application of force is required; just a tiny push over the balance point; and it will move.<br />
<br />
"Is it possible that Hurricane Katia; now pushing storm surge water onto the other side of the Mexican land mass - triggered these earth quakes?<br />
<br />
"It is. Just a feather, to shift balance. Will the rising sea levels around the world shift more plate balances? They will.<br />
<br />
"No professional geologist will stick their necks out and say that. Yet. But if you've ever played with any kind of balanced system - you know. Just a feather will do it. Yes, climate change will cause earthquakes. More, as it gets worse."<br />
<br />
------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
Pretty blunt, huh? And - an effective push on the iceberg of getting earthquakes into the climate change conversation. Why? Because now, at least 195 people will have it in their heads that "It was in the New York Times" - and they agree - and they will now feel much readier to bring the idea up in friendly conversations. Public opinion.<br />
<br />
So that's fun. And, for the inevitable readers who will vote on the "shut up you ignorant ass" side; here is a quote from <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_drift">Wikipedia</a>, on continental drift (now known and utterly accepted as "plate tectonics" - i.e. really big earthquakes.) "David Attenborough, who attended university in the second half of the 1940s, recounted an incident illustrating its lack of acceptance then: 'I once asked one of my lecturers why he was not talking to us about continental drift and I was told, sneeringly, that if I could prove there was a force that could move continents, then he might think about it. The idea was moonshine, I was informed.' "<br />
<br />
Experts and professors, historically, can be just a much ignorant asses as the rest of us.<br />
<br />
If you have the interest, reading the replies to me is kind of fun, too. Change is messy! To see the replies, you have to find my original place; look under "oldest first", should be in the first page.<br />
<br />
And - if you enjoy stirring the climate change pot - you should share that comment widely out onto the social media. I guarantee reactions.<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-83666954463236560242017-08-22T09:51:00.001-05:002017-08-22T09:51:40.088-05:00The Ice Wall Update-ethAnother bit of PR from the ice wall people; they've been coming about one a day for several days now.<br />
<br />
This one has a nice video, which I hope you will be able to access for some time; NHK has recently added the ability to share their news posts with several social media. I'm hoping that means their links will last more than one day.<br />
<br />
The video has good diagrams, and even real footage of the ice wall apparatus; good to help understand. <a href="https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20170822_19/">Take a look</a>-<br />
<br />
Typically for NHK, the printed text is almost exactly the same as what the newsreader presents, quoted below, then I have a couple comments on the hydraulics/physics after that:<br />
-------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
<b>"Fukushima ice wall's last section being frozen</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
Final procedures have begun to complete an ice wall to prevent groundwater from entering the contaminated Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Tokyo Electric Power Company workers started the process to freeze the remaining 7-meter section of the ice wall on Tuesday. They opened 11 valves to allow coolant at a temperature of minus 30 degrees Celsius to circulate in the underground pipes.<br />
<br />
TEPCO began freezing the 1.5 kilometer long wall in March of last year. The last section on the mountain side of the facility had been left unfrozen as officials said the move could cause a sudden drop in groundwater levels around the reactor buildings. But the Nuclear Regulation Authority said safety measures were in place and gave permission for the procedure earlier this month.<br />
<br />
TEPCO says it could take longer than the 2 months projected based on past records for the section to freeze, because the groundwater is flowing at a rapid rate.<br />
<br />
They say once the wall is completed, the volume of groundwater flowing into the reactor buildings will be reduced to less than 100 tons a day, from the current 140 tons. The nuclear regulators say they will carefully monitor the effectiveness of the wall.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
In good PR fashion, they are setting the stage for it to - not work. "It could take longer..."<br />
<br />
And; the physics: so, the ground water is flowing - IN - at a rapid rate? That does mean - it has to be also flowing OUT - somewhere, somehow - at a rapid rate. Which means if/when you shut the flow off, there WILL be increased pressure on the 'up' side - and decreased pressure on the 'down' side; which means the pressure gradient will be increased. <br />
<br />
The pressure on the upside is the easiest to understand, but actually the entire gradient is a better predictor of the likelihood of new leaks. Think of it as more "incentive" for the water to find a new way to move.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/fukushima-reactor--ice-wall--nearly-finished-9146284">Other Japanese news sources</a> include more definite doubts:<br />
<br />
"But some experts have cast doubt on the ice wall, and the country's Nuclear Regulation Authority said it has not yet done an independent analysis.<br />
<br />
" 'We doubt the ice wall is going to be as effective as TEPCO claims it will be," said an NRA official who spoke on condition of anonymity. 'We're going to monitor its progress after it is finished to check the impact. ' "<br />
<br />
"In June, the NRA's acting chief Toyoshi Fuketa publicly accused TEPCO of lying about the wall's effectiveness."<br />
<br />
Ice wall cost so far admitted to: ~ $320 million; paid by the "government"; i.e. Japanese taxpayers.<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-74533218805788228292017-08-21T10:45:00.000-05:002017-08-21T10:45:31.159-05:00The Ice Wall LeakethBack in March, 2016, I put up <a href="https://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2016/03/prediction-ice-wall-wont-work.html">this post</a> about the proposed "ice wall" to prevent water movement in bad places around the nuclear reactor melt-down site at Fukushima, Japan.<br />
<br />
It won't work, I said. By one sensible measure, I can claim to have been correct already; in the news release cited there the "authorities" stated "The wall is expected to start restricting the inflow of groundwater about 45 days after the freezing starts." And be finished in 4 months.<br />
<br />
Here we are, not 45 days but 17 months after they started freezing - and - the wall is not closed. It still leaks 140 tons of water a day. <br />
<br />
The whole episode is a fabulous lesson in how to spin information for public consumption. Today's press release, that they are "<a href="https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20170821_13/">about to start</a> the final phase of the freezing process" - states that "a 7 meter section has been left unfrozen" - implying that they <i>intended</i> to leave it unfrozen, for various arcane, scientific, and benevolent reasons. That is not the case. They were unable to freeze it. Which is just what I predicted from my modest understanding of hydrology and fluid dynamics (I thought that any good ecologist should be familiar with environmental forces; like rivers, ocean currents, jet streams; so, I studied them.)<br />
<br />
Reality back there was they were very unhappy and embarrassed that some of the wall refused to freeze, and they had to "study" to determine "why"; eventually coming up with the obvious- the water in those areas was flowing so fast it never got cold enough to freeze; and the high flow rate kept re-warming the soil.<br />
<br />
Most of us have personal experience with this principle of hydraulics; water under pressure, when forced to flow through a smaller channel, will flow faster. And it's very powerful. Ever have a running garden hose in your hand? Ever put your thumb over the open end- maybe to make it squirt your little brother, who thought he was a safe distance away from you? It'll really squirt. Because when you restrict it, the pressure in the immediate area of the constriction- goes way up; and the smaller stream flows much faster.<br />
<br />
And- when you tried to totally shut off the flow, using just your thumb; you couldn't do it. The pressure simply builds higher, until it finds a way through your block. Powerful stuff, water.<br />
<br />
So they've had well over a year to figure out how to freeze the high flow area. It's not impossible they may have figured out a way to shut off what has to be an enormous stream of ground water, with potentially very high pressure and flow. It can probably be done. They could make the refrigerant there much, much colder. Or, they could build an arc of more refrigeration upstream of the leak, so the water reaching the leak is just about to freeze when it gets there. <br />
<br />
And if they succeed in shutting that 7 meter leak- what will happen?<br />
<br />
100% - other places in the wall; not currently leaking; will start to leak. As a little leak starts, it will warm the area from the warmth in the water, and it will become a BIG leak; since the local pressure there is now higher than when it wasn't leaking. Shut that leak? Another will start.<br />
<br />
Check my prediction; in another year. I'm betting - 100%. And ANY physics professor should have been able to tell them this. So why do it? They have to appear to be doing something - and they have no clue what might actually be useful. None. But they're spending hundreds of millions of dollars - so it has to be worthwhile, right? It is for the contractors, I guarantee.<br />
<br />
Below is the text from the NHK press release. If you search this blog for "ice wall" there are multiple additional posts on this debacle, with more facts.<br />
<br />
"<b><a href="https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20170821_13/">Work to finish ice wall at crippled plant to begin</a></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
"The operator of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant will begin the final phase of creating an underground ice wall on Tuesday. Tokyo Electric Power Company started the work 17 months ago, with the aim of preventing groundwater from entering reactor buildings and getting contaminated with radioactive substances.<br />
<br />
"The 1.5-kilometer ice barrier is deemed a key step to curb the buildup of tainted water at the plant.<br />
<br />
"The soil is frozen by sending liquid at minus 30 degrees Celsius into pipes buried around the buildings. But the utility has left a 7-meter section unfrozen, fearing the sudden fall in groundwater levels around the buildings. There were concerns that the difference of water levels in and outside the reactor buildings would cause tainted water inside to leak out.<br />
<br />
"But last Tuesday, the Nuclear Regulation Authority said safety measures are ready and gave its approval to freeze of the final section. Officials of the utility say they will carefully monitor the freezing process of the remaining section.<br />
<br />
"They say it may take longer to fully freeze than other areas, because the flow of groundwater has been concentrated in that section.<br />
<br />
"The officials expect that the wall, when completed, will reduce the inflow of groundwater to the buildings from 140 tons a day to less than 100 tons."<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-91580965754387603142017-07-21T09:51:00.000-05:002017-07-22T09:33:12.079-05:00This is getting monotonous-<br />
Sitting here in the Little House waiting for yet another "1.000 year flood" - as prepared as we CAN be; but- that's never really enough- At the moment it looks like the heaviest core in THIS storm is going to miss us; but there are already flash flood warnings both straight west and south-<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iJ9RmJUB1uM/WXIP-Nr1p_I/AAAAAAAAAco/cMdcrh0zRyQ5VIk9G_N-AxKE5j9afZ94QCLcBGAs/s1600/July%2Bflood%2B17.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="363" data-original-width="652" height="355" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iJ9RmJUB1uM/WXIP-Nr1p_I/AAAAAAAAAco/cMdcrh0zRyQ5VIk9G_N-AxKE5j9afZ94QCLcBGAs/s640/July%2Bflood%2B17.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
And the thing is, we're forecast, very reliably; to have flooding storms pass over repeatedly - until tomorrow morning. This is just #1.<br />
<br />
If it does turn out to be a "1000 year" event, it will make the 4th one for us in the past 6 or 7 years; 2 so far had us in officially designated "Federal Disaster Areas". {FEMA, I can tell you from personal experience- is, um, how shall I put this; Not as useful as they might be.) <br />
<br />
The huge industrial agriculture farms will not suffer financially- they will get Federal aid somehow. Smaller farmers, and ones with non-standard crops - are almost never insured. Back in Flood Disaster #1; we got financial help from the <a href="https://www.iatp.org/">Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy</a>, which happens to have a main office in Minneapolis. Is flood relief on their list of aims? Nope. They just saw an urgent need; many small farmers about to get wiped out, organic ones in particular; so they organized a fundraising effort, very successfully, and got money to people who needed it.<br />
<br />
We bought a machine. FEMA's response? "Well, we know all your harvest machinery was destroyed, but you don't actually live in the flood plain." Um, no, but our machines were there, at the mechanic shop, being readied for harvest. About $10,000 worth of specialized mowers. "Sorry! You just don't fit our guidelines. Good luck."<br />
<br />
They actually said "Good luck".<br />
<br />
Well. So far; this rain is hitting us gently, falling slow and steady. That would help. We dodged the bullet 2 days ago- when folks 50 mile away got 8". They're going to get this storm, and the next ones today, too.<br />
<br />
Good luck, to us all.<br />
<br />
I'll end with a more cheerful story, from my childhood. This would have been in the 1950's. My family was moving; across the country; and my parents loved to "see the country". Understand- most of the West had only acquired 2-lane paved US highways in the previous 15 years- it was a new thing to be able to drive in many places.<br />
<br />
They decided to see the SW desert. Arizona, I think; heading to California. Back then - no one knew about "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_hypnosis">highway hypnosis</a>" yet; so the 2 lanes could go absolutely straight in front, and behind, as far as you could see (they put kinks in roads now to prevent it). And out in the middle of this desert- there really was nothing to see- besides the telephone lines next to the road. Fences sometimes. No billboards. Not even any <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burma-Shave">Burma Shaves</a>, which we loved, of course. Not enough traffic on this road to warrant anything.<br />
<br />
Speed- about 50 mph; very fast for the time. A long, long, long road; absolutely flat, in every way.<br />
<br />
Then- in the distance- a speck. Is it a speck? Took a while for my siblings to agree; it's a speck. It's getting bigger; not very fast. Eventually we can see- it's actually going to be a big billboard; commercial size.<br />
<br />
It's white. Can't see anything ON it, and here we were hoping for scantily clad cowgirls advertising casinos... Nope. Wait- there's a speck - in the middle of the billboard...<br />
<br />
We had to get to within about 50 feet of the sign in order to be able to read the very small black print.<br />
<br />
"Monotonous, ain't it?"<br />
<br />
We laughed for miles and miles. Whoever put that sign up - I still love you.<br />
<br />
And it says something nice about humans, too.<br />
<br />
-----------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
Update July 22 - we lucked out. The storm split, and went around us, mostly. We got about an inch, but after the bulk of the storm had moved on, we had flash flood warnings north, west, and south of us- and only about 20 miles away. Some of those folks got 3-6 inches.<br />
<br />
So; besides getting more frequent and more violent- is our weather also getting more - whimsical?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-10689625857149933562017-05-28T17:38:00.003-05:002017-05-28T17:38:58.791-05:00Clobbered By Climate AGAIN-It's not that I want to post a list of new ways climate change is messing things up. It's that new and unheard of things keep hitting. ME.<br />
<br />
Got a seriously weird one for ya. Did you see the news going the rounds this week about "<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/26/climate/global-warming-sleep-loss.html">global warming is messing up our sleep</a>"? It's not that. But. Sleep is involved.<br />
<br />
One thing that has been consistent over the past several years is increased cloudiness here. Being off grid, relying on solar electricity and solar heating- we <i>really really</i> notice, and take data. It's been a lot more cloudy, to the point where we have to buy more gas for the backup generators than usual (expensive) - and run them more often (wore one out, had to replace it this winter; expensive).<br />
<br />
And here we are, nearly June- and over the past week we've had maybe 1/3 of normal full sun. Most of the plants don't care, they only need a small fraction of full sun to have all they can use; but my older solar panels don't work at all except in full sun.<br />
<br />
So; had to run the house generator last night; batteries really low, so left it to run all night. It's fairly quiet; not intrusive as far as sleep goes. But there is a low solid "hum" that is always there. No biggy. And my brain is tuned to the hum - if it coughs, sputters, or the hum changes the note; I hear it instantly; the generator is going to need my attention immediately.<br />
<br />
Except. This morning, the generator was still going; but during my coffee, did finally run out of gas. Ah, the hum is gone. All good; all normal. Not going to start it again, sunny today, batteries well up. More coffee. Up to the morning computer chores.<br />
<br />
Wait - the generator is running again; the exact <i>exact</i> hum is right where it should be located from where I'm sitting; same tone, same volume. EXACTLY.<br />
<br />
What the hay? Did someone put more gas in and start it up? Odd, but not impossible. Downstairs? Still humming, just right. Outside? Humming. I had to walk all the way to the generator to check- is it running?<br />
<br />
No, it's not.<br />
<br />
But the generator hum- is right <i>there</i>. It has been all day; no drop in volume. Somehow- my brain assimilated the generator hum; and is now playing it back for me. All day. It actually has the same little normal variations that come from changes in wind direction; head movements. Exactly.<br />
<br />
Ignore it? I'm <i>tuned</i> to it; listening for malfunction. Yes, I can tell myself to ignore it, since I've now proven it's a phantom noise of some kind - but - in a few minutes, my watchdog will notice the hum again; breaking off my concentration from whatever I was working on. What? Generator? Oh, right, nope, phantom. What? Generator?...<br />
<br />
"Stuck song syndrome", now known as "earworm" - would be nice. I'd love a melody. This- is a familiar sound from my world- that is now running full time- with no cause. And sucking up a few more neurons to keep noticing it's not gone yet. They tell you to do something "moderately engaging" do a cross-word; sudoku- nope, not for this. It hums right along.<br />
<br />
And why? Cloudy weather, from climate change.<br />
<br />
Have you got a weird one? This may be the place- let me know in the comments.Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-90703888212053813142017-05-09T15:23:00.000-05:002017-08-21T10:52:50.943-05:00Understanding The Trump Phenomenon. No kidding.It took me a while, but a few days ago I finally "got a handle" on the Trump phenomenon. Really.<br />
<br />
The amount of ink, physical and digital, that has been expended so far on "understanding" what we are currently going through is likely already the all-time record. And it will certainly get far worse before it gets better. We are, pretty much entirely, baffled. How is this possible? We cry repeatedly. This makes no sense!<br />
<br />
I'm afraid I know; and the outlook is not wonderful. But- any real resolution is only possible if we can somehow <i>begin</i> to understand. I'm driven to understand not only as a scientist, but as a father, and husband to Spice- who is rabidly obsessive about the whole thing. Inescapable, for poor me.<br />
<br />
How does one "get a handle" on what appears incomprehensible? There are, in fact, historical precedents- which is where one needs to start. This all makes no sense? Then - your perspective is wrong. The universe <i>always</i> makes sense- if you look at it from the right angle. Find some other viewpoint where the problem at least does not look entirely chaotic. (Not at all easy.)<br />
<br />
One of my starting points was the example from Carl McDaniel; who set out to examine the question of how humans can survive the most extreme evolutionary challenges; looking for any hints as to how we might, perhaps, survive climate collapse. He wrote a book, which I <a href="http://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2016/03/recommended-book-at-mercy-of-nature.html">reviewed here</a> about a year ago. It is a spectacular example of how to do Science right. The important bits for this discussion; A) Find a historical example; B) start analyzing it. I recommend the book not only for the story and analysis but for the beautiful example of how to start tackling what appears to be an intractable problem.<br />
<br />
I set out to follow his lead. Are there historical examples, parallels to the Trump phenomenon? There certainly are; too many, actually. The word demagogue goes back to ancient Greece, to at least 5 BCE. The phenomenon was very well known before the word was coined; demagogues are something humans are susceptible to. We have been, as far back as we can see historically; and we clearly still are right now, all around the globe, in all cultures apparently. I prefer Napoleon to Hitler as a quintessential example- millions dead in both cases; and both sold their genocides under the illusion that it was for the benefit of humanity that millions must die. Napoleon was more cheerful about it, I think. Which is worse, to me.<br />
<br />
But. When you start looking at parallels from "politics" and/or "governments" - it quickly becomes clear that sifting truth out of such history is problematic- facts are slippery, and very frequently intentionally distorted. <br />
<br />
So- I asked myself; are there other human phenomena that parallel the Trump phenomenon, non-political ones? Realms where humans will faithfully stick to beliefs with not only no evidence of truth, but with actual repeated proofs of fallacy?<br />
<br />
A big fat obvious one suggests itself - Astrology.<br />
<br />
Astrology is very ancient indeed- and during its entire existence, serious thinkers/philosophers have taken considerable pains to point out that it cannot possibly be true. Modern science has actually tested the validity of Astrology with full rigor - and <a href="http://www.skepticalmedia.com/astrology/Scientific%20Inquiry%20into%20Astrology.pdf">found zero evidence</a> that it works - ever.<br />
<br />
And - in all those thousands of years - people have continued to believe in it, defend it, and order their lives by it. Regardless of the absurdity. And - trying to talk them out of it - <i>never, ever, works</i>. They will continue to believe.<br />
<br />
Just exactly like Trump believers. Exactly. I would challenge you to find some way in which astrology believers differ from Trump believers. I can't find any, so far.<br />
<br />
Is this helpful? Maybe. It suggests no solutions; but it does suggest one solid point - it is an utter waste of effort to try to find some key fact that will suddenly open the eyes and minds of the Trumplings. We should quit wasting time on that idea- it is clearly pointless.<br />
<br />
That, for many of us, should be a relief. "There's <i>got</i> to be a way to make them see this!" we keep hoping - and? Nothing. Not one Trumpling converted. A few middle-of-the-road types, perhaps; but they are not the problem.<br />
<br />
Us reasonable types will quickly ask "why?" Why do people continue to believe- in Astrology, and Trump? My firm belief is - <i>why does not matter</i>. And it may not be easy to find out- remember rationalists have been trying to find an answer to why for Astrology literally for thousands of years- and have discovered nothing that will help to free these delusional people from blatant fallacy. There is a suggestion in there that perhaps current human thinking is not <i>capable</i> of understanding why. Fine- the heck with "why" - move on to - finding a way to go around them.<br />
<br />
What is needed is a way to change the outcome of voting; and hence the makeup of our government. There are plenty of ways to work on that which have nothing to do with enlightening Trumplings.<br />
<br />
And who knows; thinking about it all from the Astrology perspective might eventually lead to some way to reduce their impact on the world. Think about it.<br />
<br />
One more starting point - it's fascinating, to me, that the percentage of Trumplings, and the percentage of people who say "astrology is scientific" - are shockingly close; hovering around 30% each by multiple measures. And- both have been increasing, in the past decade - not decreasing.<br />
<br />
Chew on that. It just might go somewhere.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-10908459994489010352017-04-23T12:44:00.000-05:002017-04-23T12:48:27.504-05:00Climate Change TrendsYesterday was Earth Day, and many many folks went out and Marched for Science. The photos show those folks mostly having a great time, a very good thing. We sent two marchers, both Spice and Smidgen marched in St Paul; the planners were expecting around 6,000 people; the cops later estimated over 10,000. Fox News is reporting 50,000. Interesting.<br />
<br />
I was, of course, doing my bit; holding down my keyboard. Oh, and the farm. Old-timers here know I comment regularly on the NYT, as Greenpa; and WaPo (under an older name I'm too lazy to change). Sometimes folks like what I have to say. And that is the case right at the moment.<br />
<br />
The New York Times Magazine is currently running their <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/section/magazine">Climate Issue</a>. That is a section you can reach without hitting a paywall; you can see what they're up to; what the NYT temperament is at the moment. If you're not familiar, they will let you read 10 articles a month free.<br />
<br />
On that page you will find an article on <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/magazine/how-a-warming-planet-drives-human-migration.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fmagazine&action=click&contentCollection=magazine&region=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=5&pgtype=sectionfront">How A Warming Planet Drives Human Migration</a>. Whole populations attempting to "migrate" has been a major topic in the past couple years. Is climate change the cause? Almost entirely.<br />
<br />
At the moment, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/magazine/how-a-warming-planet-drives-human-migration.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fmagazine&action=click&contentCollection=magazine&region=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=5&pgtype=sectionfront#permid=22216598">my comment</a> is the #1 Reader Pick. (If you should want to add your vote, I would not object.). I'm getting some good comments, too - even no trolls, yet!<br />
<br />
I'm going to put the text of that comment here; since I know links and access are iffy these days:<br />
<br />
<br />
"I was a speaker at the climate change conferences in 1988 (DC) and 1989 (Cairo) - and can tell you that all of this was fully predicted by us, back then. Also water wars and the rise of demagogues and authoritarian governments.<br />
<br />
"It was not only predictable; we predicted it. A fantasy scientists often adhere to is that if they can explain the situation clearly, then humanity will of course respond with wise action. Ah, the irony.<br />
<br />
"It is NOT that we do not have persons provably able to give good advice and predictions; it is that world-wide, our joint decision making processes are universally broken. We do not have one government of the planet capable of taking significant action.<br />
<br />
"We know what to do. We just can't do it. That - is the problem."<br />
<br />
<br />
I did, after Sandy, say bluntly "WE TOLD YOU SO." This is kind of the same thing; but a bit more polite (I believe in polite - first. Rude when necessary.) Interesting that my rude comment on Justin Gillis' "<a href="https://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/did-global-warming-contribute-to-hurricane-sandys-devastation/">oh we can't be sure</a>" article - and all other comments, many rude - have been deleted from the archives. But the story is still <a href="http://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2012/11/pushing-on-bergs-berg-moves.html">here</a>.<br />
<br />
Interesting today that most of the NYT readers looking at that article have chosen the I -told-you-so viewpoint to recommend. It's not an optimistic one. Which may be an optimistic observation, actually; if we're ever going to get off our collective butts and take serious action, the first thing that has to happen is we have to lose the complacent notion that somebody else will fix this. <br />
<br />
Nobody else is going to fix this; government "policy" approaches are crippled, world-wide, and recent elections illustrate how easy it is for policy to be derailed by the next swing of the Perpetual Political Pendulum. The PPP. (Polka Dot Gallows humor...)<br />
<br />
The March For Science showed there are still an abundance of sane and passionate humans out there. Keep that in mind. Join them; and remember your Newtonian Physics: momentum - takes Work to stop or alter. <br />
<br />
Keep the momentum. Add to it. Act. Because, as one of the many great sign comments from yesterday's march has it:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TyE1zvtYY-o/WPznwvg1tBI/AAAAAAAAAcM/GYbwrRZXP4YxkDsdpx7uYzLY2pjHB3YzQCK4B/s1600/980x.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="280" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TyE1zvtYY-o/WPznwvg1tBI/AAAAAAAAAcM/GYbwrRZXP4YxkDsdpx7uYzLY2pjHB3YzQCK4B/s400/980x.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-21030048869534451212017-02-07T12:12:00.000-06:002018-01-04T11:11:59.259-06:00Jet streams-A bunch of great comments on the past post- thanks! The one from KnuttyKnitter- aka Viv in NZ, turned into this post when I started trying to just make a quick comment back. New Zealand weather is getting goofy, too.<br />
<br />
Viv - I'm a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_stream">jet stream</a> freak; have been studying it for decades, literally. Part of being an ecologist, for me; should any ecologist attempt to understand weather and climate? Sure. And we've known for a long time that fluctuations in the jet streams drive a whole lot of weather.<br />
<br />
My favorite comprehensible model is <a href="http://www.stormsurfing.com/cgi/display_alt.cgi?a=glob_250">here</a>. The "streams" have not ever been what we think of looking at a river; they come, go, pause, start. But. The "norm"; possibly now gone forever, is that both hemispheres have (had) two jet streams; the polar jet, and the subtropical jet. In both hemispheres, the streams blow from west to east.<br />
<br />
That normal pattern is now hard to even see in that model. Two streams? Where? Looks like a mess, right? You did used to be able to see the "2 streams" clearly and consistently, fluctuations notwithstanding. <br />
<br />
Up until 5 or 6 years ago, it was almost unheard of for - the polar jet, and the subtropical jet to MEET. They pretty much stayed in their own backyards. But a few years back it started becoming more and more common for the northern hemisphere streams to shift so far they would actually bump into each other. Then - they started not only <i>meeting</i> - but - for long distances and long periods of time; they would <i>MERGE</i> - leaving great chunks of the northern hemisphere with only ONE jet stream. <br />
<br />
That does crazy things to weather, and was a primary driver in the years long California drought (now over - ish). Meterologists have been privately goggling at each other and muttering "Merge?? <i>They merged</i>?? WTF!!??" <br />
<br />
Viv - here's the specific thing- until just the past 6 months or so; the southern hemisphere jet streams were still behaving "normally" - 2 jets, one polar, one subtropical. But. If you look at the model; they are now starting to form huge loops - and meet - and merge. You are not likely to hear that from any official meteorology expert any time soon; the phenomenon is too new (though it's been consistent for 6 months now) - and they have reputations to protect. But. I've been watching; closely. The consistency, and the parallel with the process that has gone on for years now in the northerns hemisphere are significant.<br />
<br />
Yes, it's going to mess up the weather, and normal seasonal expectations, all over the planet. And for the most part it is outside all the training and expectations of the best meteorologists- just very hard to guess what comes next. Best bets, based on the past years in the northern hemisphere; droughts, floods, bigger and more frequent storms. <br />
<br />
One of the things we do know about jet streams is - we don't know ANYTHING about jet streams. We know this from? Space exploration. Below is the polar jet stream on - Saturn; viewed from directly above Saturn's north pole. As reported by Voyager in 1981-82; and Cassini in 2006-2009. Courtesy of NASA.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-M_HevugUvY0/WJoJ2HstQ3I/AAAAAAAAAbo/VKq-_ZEW2uUVOTVRCyT5U-eOsK_7sZMQQCLcB/s1600/pia17652-640.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="218" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-M_HevugUvY0/WJoJ2HstQ3I/AAAAAAAAAbo/VKq-_ZEW2uUVOTVRCyT5U-eOsK_7sZMQQCLcB/s400/pia17652-640.gif" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
It forms a hexagon. ???!!! And - in all the time we've known about it, and watched it - it has been STABLE. It doesn't change. No loops up, or down. When the first images from Cassini came in, the exo-meteorologists were stunned - <i>no one</i> had expected that weird hexagon to persist over 25 years.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
What if- Earth's jet streams suddenly hit whatever conditions are required for our jet streams to drop into this kind of stable configuration? Could that happen?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
We don't have a clue. The one thing we know for sure- weather and climate would be hugely, drastically, affected. And would stay in whatever pattern showed up. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Seriously. Buckle up. If you haven't already started.</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-14108938213593066812017-01-22T11:53:00.000-06:002017-01-22T12:54:56.220-06:00Add to our climate change list...<br />
As you know, we live off the grid; have for nearly 40 years now. Our energy consumption, capture, and storage protocols were based on "normal" weather; normal winter and summer sun and wind.<br />
<br />
But- we don't have them any more. Typically here in SE Minnesota, late January and early February are brilliantly sunny. Cold; but totally clear skies. That works great for photovoltaic power, in fact; yes, the days are shorter, but the cold dramatically increases the panels' output; for every 3°C colder than the specified temp; which is around +27°C; the panels put out 1% more power than specs. So- when it's -10°F; e.g. -23°C; which used to be very common week long temperatures here; the panels are putting out around 17% more power. That's a lot.<br />
<br />
The past several years though have shown a new January/February pattern - which does not include sunny days. Warm (for January in Minnesota) - it hasn't been below freezing for a week now- and...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GbEfiaW1hxs/WITtcx3It-I/AAAAAAAAAbM/6W144GhS7L4bEHgitNyKUaqhSQP0zhSbwCLcB/s1600/nifle%2B0627.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="480" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GbEfiaW1hxs/WITtcx3It-I/AAAAAAAAAbM/6W144GhS7L4bEHgitNyKUaqhSQP0zhSbwCLcB/s640/nifle%2B0627.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
This is what our world has looked like, for days, and days, and days....... we are now living in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niflheim">Niflheim</a>; one of the realms from Norse Mythology - "Mist World". Primordial snow and ice and damp- and no sun. Yup. Here we are. Well, plus we have primordial mud, at 2 PM daily.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Besides being depressing, just a bit, our energy processes are messed up, good. No, solar panels do not put out significant power in this kind of fog/cloud cover. So- we are forced to burn gasoline to run our backup generators, which we have for the supposedly occasional week with no sun. Those sunless weeks happened every year - once, or twice. Now- we have them every other week. It seems. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Which creates another "not in the plans" problem- we own 4 backup generators; for 3 locations and a spare... 3 out of 4 are now dead; from being run so constantly; far more than designed for. We now spend an hour or so a day running the one generator around (in the slush no vehicle can move through) from one site to another; and wondering if we have enough gas...</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
And if you are using solar heat - same thing; your building will not be getting warm today.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
These impacts are here, now. Affecting everyone. But it's like "being nibbled to death by ducks" - it kind of seems harmless; until you die.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
It's not harmless, though; it's cumulative, and weakens everything we depend on.</div>
Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-12516110035597281752017-01-10T16:33:00.003-06:002017-01-11T10:08:20.256-06:00Cheer up, Brian! Things could be worse! (#3)<br />
That's the line from the final scene of Monty Python's "The Life of Brian". As they are being crucified.<br />
<br />
I've been quiet here for a good while, because I was trying to only post positive stuff. There really hasn't been much, has there?<br />
<br />
So. Moving right along. Going with the flow. Bad news, it is. <br />
<br />
Spice asked me this morning when climate change was really going to hit. The answer, of course, is; it already has. Yes, it really is too late to take any actions that will prevent truly major climate disruptions, that will affect humans around the world - drastically.<br />
<br />
“ 'We have not arrived in our climate of the future, but we have certainly left our climate of the past,' said Deke Arndt, chief of the National Centers’ climate monitoring branch. " That's from an article in Bloomberg a couple days ago, "<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-09/climate-disasters-cost-u-s-46-billion-as-flooding-leads-list">Climate Disasters Cost U.S. $46 Billion as Flooding Leads List</a>"<br />
<br />
Floods? What floods? The news is all full of - you know what; and Meryl Streep. Not about the current <a href="https://weather.com/news/weather/news/deadly-flooding-thailand-halts-rubber-production">disaster in Thailand</a>, which is wrecking their tourist income again and has 700,000 people homeless; nor about the current "atmospheric river" bringing huge <a href="http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-blizzard-storm-california-20170110-htmlstory.html">floods and storms to California</a>; nor the highly unusual heavy <a href="http://www.rgj.com/story/news/2017/01/10/flood-update-sparks-reopens-industrial-area-roads/96399582/?from=global&sessionKey=&autologin=">flooding in - Nevada</a>?? They're sandbagging in Reno and Sparks- and worried the floods could get into downtown Reno... ?<br />
<br />
News? Nah. Happens all the time. Going to get worse; boring news now.<br />
<br />
And here in the Big Woods- 3 nights ago, our thermometer registered -16°F; "sixteen below zero". This morning; it was +34°F - and - first raining (on a landscape that was at 16 below = bad ice on everything) - then; we got a lovely, typical snow. Typical for - mid April. In early January. (Sorry about the crummy video quality here- trying to keep my bandwidth consumption down...)<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.blogger.com/video.g?token=AD6v5dy1vo5550lSBUdd9KnqFqwGAFI2aKyaFEW0Ikg9I8HjdEiO202lAljwuiBf6_5xSZAq9miRTEnvfuwKOGkl2w' class='b-hbp-video b-uploaded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />
Leaving us, a little later, with beautiful woods, and more broken trees-<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Sh8j7dtoe20/WHVeXVgieFI/AAAAAAAAAaw/RhSpqFhUsxIw5EN_73fvZpP5KTMJQ4F-gCLcB/s1600/april%2Bsnow%2B0605.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="480" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Sh8j7dtoe20/WHVeXVgieFI/AAAAAAAAAaw/RhSpqFhUsxIw5EN_73fvZpP5KTMJQ4F-gCLcB/s640/april%2Bsnow%2B0605.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Normal April snow. What is NOT normal about this storm is the wind that is following it- April storms don't work that way... </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.blogger.com/video.g?token=AD6v5dxnwDlY6rVWokTtLCtXEyR-7CoGMYaSSjstmAoVhyXzVABB-GUtABEVddiA-LTq3FeHp82cKkI1gTbIX1mUuQ' class='b-hbp-video b-uploaded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The kind of thing that breaks even healthy trees. Radical temperature swings continue- down to +9 last night; going to -5°F next night- and up to near +40°F by next week. Really, really not normal here.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
AND - in case your lust for doom is not yet sated; have you heard about the immense chunk of Antarctic ice that is going to break loose any day now? The one- the size of Delaware, and 1,100 feet thick? </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The part about "things could be worse!" ? Count on it; they will be worse in the decades ahead. 100% of everything points that way; no, magic technology is not going to fix this.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
If you currently live on a flood plain- or a sea coast - seriously; find a way to move your family elsewhere, and right now. While you can still find climate change deniers to sell to...</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Depressing. Yes it is. Hang in there. Anyway. </div>
Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-69333467065005209752016-08-06T10:30:00.000-05:002016-08-06T10:30:03.989-05:00A little "social media" request........As a few old-timers here may know, I spend just a little time "commenting" on news stories in the major media; The New York Times, The Washington Post, sometimes Huffpo and others.<br />
<br />
If, and when, I have something to say, and if and when I think someone might actually listen.<br />
<br />
I have a little request for you - which might make a difference. We all know that "economists" couldn't predict their way out of a wet paper bag - but people still keep asking them what to think. Mind boggling.<br />
<br />
Right this very minute - the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/07/upshot/were-in-a-low-growth-world-how-did-we-get-here.html">New York Times</a> has a nice feature pointing out that the entire world has entered a "slow growth" phase. And that the "forecasters" once again didn't see it coming; and still persist in saying growth will resume very soon. We base our fiscal "policy" on these fantasies.<br />
<br />
I made a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/07/upshot/were-in-a-low-growth-world-how-did-we-get-here.html#permid=19402679">comment</a>. At the moment, to my surprise, it's running high in the readers "Readers' Picks"; about 6th in the list. <br />
<br />
Basically it says "this is what ecologists have always predicted - and here we are."<br />
<br />
The vast majority of the commenters add ideas and theories from "economics". All beautifully explanatory and contradictory - and authoritative. Despite never having accurately predicted anything.<br />
<br />
You know - I think it just MIGHT make a difference if a bunch of the readers here added their recommendations - and bumped that comment up in the list. Perhaps a few more people might notice "- hm - economists' predictions never work out - ecologists' predictions usually do..."<br />
<br />
I think that would actually be progress. Give it a try! Can't hurt - might help.Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-79284622343204111802016-07-19T08:19:00.000-05:002016-07-19T08:20:06.212-05:00What Ice Wall? Phase 2Entire <a href="http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20160719_33/">post from NHK</a> below- with not one single mention of the ice wall. Instead- the regulators think TEPCO really should DO something about the problem - since - they haven't. They <i>are</i> doing a study, though! Thank goodness. Oh, and this press release points out they are still pumping water into the melted down reactors to cool them. And the water then goes - where? They're not sure.<br />
<br />
<b>"TEPCO urged to cut risk of radioactive water leak</b><br />
<br />
"Japan's nuclear regulator has urged the operator of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant to reduce the risk of leaking of highly radioactive water from the facility into the sea, in case of another tsunami.<br />
<br />
"About 60,000 tons of such water is believed to have pooled in reactor buildings at the plant. The operator, Tokyo Electric Power Company, or TEPCO, is injecting water into the buildings to cool melted nuclear fuel, and groundwater is flowing into their basements.<br />
<br />
"The Nuclear Regulation Authority instructed TEPCO at a meeting on Tuesday to urgently study measures to lower the amount and radiation levels of the water.<br />
<br />
"The authority proposed 2 measures to TEPCO. One is building more tanks to store the water, even though the plant has about one thousand tanks. The other is treating the water using a system designed to filter out radioactive material, and circulating the water in a cooling system.<br />
<br />
"NRA member Toyoshi Fuketa said the utility cannot keep the water in the buildings forever. He said TEPCO should handle the water problem either along with that of other radioactive water or first of all.<br />
<br />
"Following the NRA's instruction, TEPCO is to report the results of its study at a meeting next month or later."Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-48007943416882371282016-07-18T09:42:00.001-05:002016-07-18T10:27:07.617-05:00The Whole Truth About "Economics".Buckle up. Exactly how often these days do you have a chance at "the whole truth"?? But here it is.<br />
<br />
A couple days ago, Ilargi over at <a href="https://www.theautomaticearth.com/">The Automatic Earth</a> posted a cartooned short lecture from "legendary economist Ha-Joon Chang" on - Economics. <br />
<br />
Back in the dark ages of blogging, around 2008-2010, when I was posting frequently, I tracked the "rank" of my blog using the now extinct Technorati statistics. I was pleased when I eventually ranked up in the top 4% (as high as I got, but darn good) - but surprised to find that their measure of my "authority"; a statistic I don't understand at all, had me ranked pretty high for ecology - but higher for economics. What? A surprise to me; though both fields have the same Greek root in oikos, house, they notoriously don't talk much. <br />
<br />
Apparently though, if you are trained in the study of resources, their uses, values, and flows - it becomes easy to notice when Economists are talking total nonsense. Which is often/always; as every study has always shown. Look up 'monkeys are smarter than investors" if you want to get into that topic. Ha-Joon Chang has noticed the nonsense from <i>inside</i> the field - a considerable recommendation. Take a look; not while you're distracted, because between the ironic narration and the double-entendre animations, this is packed tight:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://youtu.be/NdbbcO35arw"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NdbbcO35arw/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/NdbbcO35arw?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Then; if you have the urge; take the time to search this blog right here for the simple word "economics". You'll find I made many of the exact same statements about economics and economists, years ago. Alas that I can't claim to be a legendary economist, though. (No disparagement of Chang intended, I actually think he is truly brilliant - and speaks the truth.)<br />
<br />
And the Moral Of The Story: according to both a legendary economist and Greenpa; Economics is a meaningless field of study. Really. Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-14770167616653355272016-07-10T12:33:00.002-05:002016-07-10T23:43:03.882-05:00The Way ForwardAt the moment, everyone on the planet is greatly afraid that we have no way forward.<br />
<br />
I certainly don't know what will happen; but I do know these things: time will pass, we will change, and it is possible to try to find a "better way."<br />
<br />
It would be good to remember at this point that History does have examples of times when we found a better way. The abolition of slavery, for example and women's suffrage. It would also be good to remember that both those events were painful; and neither resulted in completely solving the problems; slavery most certainly still exists, and many situations exist where great chunks of the populace have no say whatever in their governance.<br />
<br />
But the effort was made; by millions of us, and the outcome <i>was</i> better. Hang on to that.<br />
<br />
A few more things we know. In all cases where we found better ways, the truth, and fairness (not quite the same thing as justice) played major roles. Truth, because any path based on untruth must fail by the laws of physics; and fairness - because somehow, we creatures of Earth are built to expect it. Not only humans, but most species ever tested—primates, dogs, horses, crows, ravens— expect fairness, and resent its absence - sometimes violently. (Google 'sense of fairness in ... ' if you want to check.)<br />
<br />
Right now, our major social battles seem to be very short on truth, and very short on fairness.<br />
<br />
There are some major truths we all know- which are not allowed to be uttered publicly. Like. Some police are racist. All of them? No. But some, yes. And the cops are not doing anything about it.<br />
<br />
512 people have been killed in the USA by police so far this year; 990 were killed last year. How do we know? The Washington Post decided someone should look into the matter- since no federal agency keeps statistics on police related killings; nor do local police report them. Here is the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/">WaPo database</a>. 59 police officers have died <a href="https://www.odmp.org/search/year">in the line of duty</a> this year; 29 by gunfire. <br />
<br />
Just so we know.<br />
<br />
And - people, and parties, on all sides of everything — are afraid. And fear makes us blind and foolish — and dangerous; to others and to ourselves. Also untruthful; and unfair.<br />
<br />
Just saying those things out loud, as part of the conversation, is a first step. What to do about it can come later.<br />
<br />
Speak truth. Work for fairness. I'm afraid.<br />
<br />
If you're looking for common ground- there it is.Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-57671912216932993692016-06-06T12:32:00.003-05:002016-06-06T12:32:52.268-05:00"Oh, you mean THAT ice wall. Well...""Since the ice isn't stopping the water, now we're going to pump cement into the leaks."<br />
<br />
Um. Hey, if cement was going to work, wouldn't it have been cheaper to just pump cement in the first place? <br />
<br />
Nope, not going to work, either. If water flow is reduced here- the pressure, and flow rate, will go up there- making a new leak in a place where the ice was - sort of- working.<br />
<br />
Which is why they didn't try cement in the first place. It's a game of whack-a-mole; where the moles dig new holes as fast as you whack. But hey- we're doing something!<br />
<br />
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20160606_28/<br />
<h3>
"TEPCO expands ice wall operations at Fukushima</h3>
"Tokyo Electric Power Company has expanded operations to create an underground ice wall at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant to stop the volume of contaminated groundwater from increasing.<br />
<br />
"TEPCO on Monday began injecting a liquid refrigerant into more pipes that make up the 1,500-meter wall surrounding 4 damaged reactor buildings. The operation now covers 95 percent of the wall.<br />
<br />
"Groundwater flows into the buildings and becomes tainted with radioactive substances. Reducing its volume is a key to decommissioning the reactors.<br />
<br />
"The operation started in March on the downstream side of the wall because lowering the water levels too much could cause tainted water to leak from the buildings.<br />
<br />
"Workers began freezing the upstream side after making sure there were no leaks.<br />
<br />
"The ice wall project still faces challenges. Ground temperatures have not fallen in some places, and groundwater levels outside the wall have not gone down.<br />
<br />
"Also on Monday, workers began injecting cement into the ground where temperatures have not fallen."<br />
<br />
------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
Particularly fun is this bit:<br />
<br />
"Workers began freezing the upstream side after making sure there were no leaks.<br />
<br />
"The ice wall project still faces challenges. Ground temperatures have not fallen in some places, and groundwater levels outside the wall have not gone down."<br />
<br />
Translation: They started freezing the other side after making sure there were no leaks. But there are leaks - with no measurable effect on water levels anywhere.................<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-21232541527491717922016-06-05T13:49:00.000-05:002016-06-05T13:51:53.981-05:00"Ice wall? What ice wall?"You can learn a huge amount about how to obfuscate everything using Public Relations, just by reading, sequentially, the press releases about the Fukushima "incident".<br />
<br />
Today, from NHK (as usual, copied in toto here) "They believe that water is leaking from a hole near the cooling system. .. Water injected to cool the melted nuclear fuel continues to leak into the reactor building."<br />
<br />
And there is not a peep here, in this article about water leaking, about any ice wall, intended to stop water from leaking...<br />
<br />
What they are not explicit about is that they are still pumping water directly on to the melted reactor core; in order to keep it from reaching "prompt criticality" - as soon as it's hot enough. That's a little mini-nuclear explosion; not a bomb, but an actual chain reaction fission event powerful enough to blow the melted core all over the prefecture (and into the ocean). <br />
<br />
So, we don't want that, do we, so, we keep pumping water in- and it keeps disappearing somewhere (i.e. leaking out- after having been in the reactor core... and not just "into the reactor building".<br />
<br />
Oh, and, in the following story they neatly avoid mentioning that THREE reactor cores melted down entirely- they just want to talk about #2 here. Oh, and, it wasn't really their fault; the reactor, and all its safety devices, didn't work right. Can't blame us for a bad machine, now really.<br />
<br />
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20160605_02/<br />
<h2>
<b>TEPCO:Cooling water leakage likely caused meltdown</b></h2>
"The operator of the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant says a water leak in the number 2 reactor emergency cooling system may have contributed to its meltdown.<br />
<br />
"The plant lost power following a massive earthquake and tsunami on March 11th 2011.<br />
<br />
"The emergency cooling system began operating right away, driven by steam generated in the reactors. The system's pumps were designed to inject coolant into the reactors during an emergency.<br />
<br />
"The number 2 reactor's emergency cooling equipment lost its function on March 14th, 3 days after the disaster.<br />
<br />
"The exact cause of the failure remains unknown more than 5 years after the accident.<br />
<br />
"Workers tried to inject water from outside, but were unsuccessful in cooling it down. This led to the nuclear fuel meltdown and release of radioactive substances into the air that spread across the region.<br />
<br />
"Experts at Tokyo Electric Power Company analyzed the level of contaminated water inside the number 2 reactor, as well as the amount of leaked water.<br />
<br />
"They believe that water is leaking from a hole near the cooling system.<br />
<br />
"The experts suspect that cooling water began leaking from the system after the pumps had operated beyond the 8 hours for which they were designed.<br />
<br />
"They believe the water leakage was the major cause of the reactor heating up.<br />
<br />
"Water injected to cool the melted nuclear fuel continues to leak into the reactor building. This contaminated water is hampering decommissioning work at the plant."<br />
<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
We can all be grateful they continue to work so diligently on the "problems". <br />
<br />
And actually; if you read the above in one particular way, what it says is: "The meltdown caused the emergency cooling system to break down, which caused the meltdown." Yeah, it can be read differently; but.<br />
<br />
The experts suspect.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-69395595844179348532016-05-29T09:30:00.000-05:002016-05-29T09:30:39.380-05:00It's Official. The Ice Wall Isn't Working.<br />
I'm going to just paste the entire <a href="http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20160529_11/">article from NHK</a> below, since they disappear so regularly and the links expire. <br />
<br />
There was another TEPCO press release a week ago, which I did not repeat here; with the (approximate) headline "Ice Wall Is Proving Effective". Actually, nothing in the article supported that headline; they were reporting that around 80% of measurements showed soil now at 0° C - ignoring all kinds of stuff like - 20% unfrozen is equal to - total failure.<br />
<h3>
<b>"More measures needed for Fukushima ice wall</b></h3>
"The operator of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant is considering conducting additional work to help freeze the ground around the crippled reactors.<br />
<br />
"Tokyo Electric Power Company began freezing the soil in late March to build a 1.5-kilometer underground ice wall around the 4 reactors. The utility wants to reduce the amount of groundwater flowing into the reactor buildings, because it becomes contaminated with radioactive substances.<br />
<br />
"TEPCO says the ground at multiple locations along the barrier has yet to reach below zero degree Celsius and one checkpoint remain at around 10 degrees. <br />
<br />
"It says those areas contain more gravel and that the accumulated groundwater may be hampering the freezing process.<br />
<br />
"It is studying additional measures, such as pouring chemical compounds to solidify the ground, and will discuss its ideas with Nuclear Regulation Authority.<br />
<br />
"TEPCO had hoped to expand by this month the areas to be frozen but say it will examine the timing carefully, taking into consideration the problem facing the project."<br />
<br />
-------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
One specific point: "TEPCO says the ground at multiple locations along the barrier has yet to reach below zero degree Celsius and one checkpoint remain at around 10 degrees." <br />
<br />
That would be where water is running fast through gravel, keeping the temp high- inevitable, as I predicted. The more the water is constricted elsewhere; the faster this water will flow. And there are multiple other factors that also still make this pointless.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-20389029800482556022016-05-04T19:51:00.003-05:002016-05-05T08:19:46.776-05:00Ice wall won't work- will anything?<br />
This post updated next day:<br />
<br />
Comment on the last post:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<dt id="c8088756032382208845" style="color: #202020; cursor: pointer; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.200000762939453px; margin: 10px 0px 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0.25em; white-space: nowrap;"> <span dir="ltr"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/06745318819534793538" rel="nofollow" style="color: #1155cc; text-decoration: none;">Lynx</a></span> said...</dt>
<dd style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.200000762939453px; margin: 0px 0px 0.75em; padding: 0px;"><div style="margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px;">
I am wondering, do you have any thoughts or ideas about what CAN be done to fix/take care of the radiation problem in Japan? Things that will actually work.</div>
<div class="comment-timestamp" style="display: inline-block; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px;">
April 30, 2016 at 6:11 PM</div>
</dd><br />
The answers are no fun; and scientifically "not established" - which is why they just gave up on Chernobyl and have tried to bury it in concrete; and keep people out of the contaminated areas.<br />
<br />
General consensus among those who know is that Fukushima is at least as "dirty" as Chernobyl; it's just that the Japanese government spends most of its disaster funds denying that, so tourists won't disappear. It's really bad.<br />
<br />
Here are 3 really good links for you to dig in to- with the caveat that they all have unstated biases, and you need, always, to be reading between the lines. But- here is very good information; like the actual cost of the ice wall, just the construction? Around $330 Million. Oh; and- to run the refrigeration machinery; for the next 200 years, at least- the wall uses enough electricity to power 13,000 Japanese homes. Every day.<br />
<br />
This is the <a href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/04/29/national/fukushima-plants-new-ice-wall-will-not-be-watertight-says-chief-architect/#.Vyp2yMY9W0Y">Japan Times</a>, Japan's <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Japan_Times">largest English language newspaper</a>, owned by a company that manufactures "automotive fasteners"... <br />
<br />
That article was cited here: "<a href="http://enenews.com/experts-fukushima-ice-wall-could-destroy-reactor-buildings-turn-site-swamp-concern-fractures-ground-movement-subsidence-around-structures-will-stay-frozen-200-year-period-govt-observable-heav">Experts: Fukushima ‘ice wall’ could destroy reactor units, turn site into swamp — Risk of fractures, ground movement, building subsidence </a>— Must be frozen for 200 years",,, — in an online source that struck me as maybe a bit fanatical - until I saw their major supporting testimonial comes from this guy:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Gundersen">Arnie Gundersen</a> - a real, live, certified nuclear power engineer and past nuclear industry executive- who was the only one speaking up and speaking the truth during the primary Fukushima events. He does tend to speak mostly technical answers- really technical. But he also does <i>not</i> speak with a forked tongue. How do I know? He pretty much always agrees with my own analyses from the data. (That's supposed to be a joke; but it's also true.)<br />
<br />
Quick bottom line? The stuff in nuclear reactors is just way too dangerous for humans to ever deal with. Do humans make mistakes? The entire nuclear power industry is predicated on the idea that we can operate insanely complex machines - perfectly. Forever. The radioactive stuff inside will get out in time- and it has more time than we do- and then it's unbelievably dangerous. Humans simply do not have ANY way to cope with it. Japan is busy pretending to be busy- because they have no idea what to do. Nor does anyone else. Should have thought of this stuff before building all those reactors? Nah. "Trust us, we can make this work just fine." According to the engineers hired by the guys making all the profits- which are huge for those doing the construction.<br />
<br />
My solution? Start shutting the power plants down, as fast as we can (just like Germany) - hopefully before the stuff comes out, via terrorist bombs, computer hacking, or stupidity- and then what can we do with it?<br />
<br />
Not a single "repository" in use or planned is vaguely functional or adequate; it has to be "kept secure" - for 10,000 years. Yeah really.<br />
<br />
Here's the ONLY place I think we should put it: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subduction">continental plate subduction trenches</a>. You put the waste into a scrap submarine (for example) - fill the sub half full of radioactives in sealed casks, the other half of the sub filled with lead - guide it into the deepest ocean trench you can find -which is also a subduction trench - and sink it as deep as it's possible to go. A) terrorists can't reach it. B) it's all so heavy, lead and uranium; that if it starts to leak, it's not coming out of the trench anyway, and C) geology will carry it, about 8 centimeters a year, down into the Earth's mantle; below the crust. It won't be coming back to the surface for a billion years or so; if ever. Guaranteed by physics. Even the half-lives of that crud will be expired by then.<br />
<br />
Why aren't we doing this? Money. This would actually be incredibly CHEAPER than anything else; but doesn't involve $Billions/year in very reliable income for the companies currently babysitting all the nuclear waste. They love their jobs - put up a fence and watch. And it's SO easy to scare folks with "oh, gosh, no, we should NEVER put it into our sacred OCEAN!! Horrors!" <br />
<br />
Not a great solution. But- probably better than anything else. And not my idea- it's been kicked around for decades- and discussion is always quietly squashed.<br />
----------------------------------------------------<br />
Update:<br />
<br />
Tripped on this today; the evidence for the "money" connection to bad nuclear waste storage:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/hanford-nuclear-reservation-radioactive-waste-454808">Newsweek</a> - an article on "The American Fukushima?" - by which they mean the old Hanford nuclear site in eastern Washington; where plutonium for bombs was produced:<br />
<br />
"The 177 underground tanks were never a permanent solution, and the government has hired private contractors to build a plant that will solidify the waste and prepare it for permanent safe storage. The project will cost <i>an astonishing $110 billion</i>, according to estimates, making it what many believe to be the most expensive, and extensive, environmental remediation project in the world. Completion is about five decades away."<br />
<br />
Italics mine. Really good profit margins; and zero risk, the taxpayers will pay for any cost overruns, delays, etc. My off the top of my head cost for constructing guidable barges, loading the waste on them, and sinking it in the nearest deep subduction zone - a paltry $10 billon, perhaps. Oh, and it could all be done in maybe 20 years; not 50, for another temporary "solution".<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<dd style="border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 1px; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.200000762939453px; margin: 0px 0px 0.75em; padding: 0px;"><div>
<br /></div>
</dd>Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-43970884153320672862016-03-30T09:27:00.000-05:002016-03-30T09:27:08.177-05:00Prediction: The Ice Wall Won't Work.Today several years after announcing the wonderful concept of freezing the soil around the core-breached reactors at Fukushima, "officials" announce they are going to actually start freezing soil today. The point to which is - it turns out the natural groundwater in the area flows (underground) through serious contamination, and then both comes up into the broken cellars of the nuclear plant, and oh, incidentally, flows right out into the sea. (They know that, but the "official" announcement that contamination has been leaking into the sea constantly is probably 2 years away.)<br />
<br />
Here is link and text; and my detailed prediction below it:<br />
<br />
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20160330_18/<br />
<br />
"TEPCO to start freezing wall at Fukushima plant<br />
<br />
"The operator of the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant has gained approval from the regulator to start freezing soil around its reactors. Tokyo Electric Power Company, or TEPCO plans to create an ice wall that will reduce the amount of groundwater flowing into the 4 reactor buildings and thereby limit the buildup of radioactive water.<br />
<br />
"The utility got the go-ahead on Wednesday from the Nuclear Regulation Authority, or NRA, to begin the underground freezing. It is expected to start the work as early as Thursday. The volume of contaminated water at the plant is increasing due to inflowing groundwater.<br />
<br />
"Once the freezing process is complete, together with other measures, the daily accumulation of underground water is expected to fall from 400 tons to about 50 tons. The wall is expected to start restricting the inflow of groundwater about 45 days after the freezing starts.<br />
<br />
"TEPCO finished building the underground freezing systems last month, after 2 years of work.<br />
<br />
"But the regulator did not immediately give the greenlight to its freezing plans. It was concerned the wall could lower the groundwater level too much and cause radioactive water pooled in the reactor buildings to leak out.<br />
<br />
"TEPCO submitted a revised plan to do the freezing work in stages. Under the new plan, it will first freeze soil at the downstream side of the buildings to prevent water leaking there.<br />
<br />
"NRA Chairman Shunichi Tanaka said the operation will be a major challenge. He said it is important to carefully monitor the freezing process with adequate data."<br />
<br />
----------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
My prediction; based not on rancor or ill wishes but on Physics, Chemistry, and Hydrology: the ice wall will not work. Will never work, can not ever be made to work, and is quite likely to cause new and possibly worse problems with contaminated water at the site.<br />
<br />
"Why" it won't work requires long discussion, which perhaps we will do after it is announced that it isn't working; my guess will that announcement will happen within the next two months. Hard to cover up 200 tons of new water every day.<br />
<br />
So why did they build it, if common science says it can't work? Several reasons, none good- A) they don't know how to do anything that might be effective, B) They have to appear to be doing something, and C) There is a huge amount of money to be made, from public funds, building something so wacky. When it fails, they'll just wring their hands and walk away- the executives with fat bank accounts, and the public reputation of saints struggling with evil.Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com10tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-62386593292320406142016-03-20T12:40:00.000-05:002016-03-21T15:34:04.968-05:00Recommended book: At The Mercy Of Nature<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
Tools are what we need, to survive what is coming. Humans are tool users, tool makers - an aspect of our species that is largely responsible for climate change, the population explosion, and pretty much everything else we can point fingers at "that's the problem, right there!" Our tools (I'm including things like antibiotics) gave humans the power to expand; so we did; and here we are.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
My fingers are trying to trick me into writing a whole long essay on "tools"; but that will have to wait...</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
What tools do you, do we, need going into this unknown future? We really don't know; that's a big part of our worries. An ever-increasing number of charlatans are willing to sell you magic survival tools; be very wary. </div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
When we “don’t know” something- how do we, human tool users, tackle that? In this era, "Science" is our standard answer; wave the Magic Wand Of Science, and Answers will appear.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
Not going into that right now, either. What I have to offer you here is something unique, so far as I know- a fully competent practitioner of Science has waved his highly trained Wand - appropriately - and come up not with all the Answers; but with clear vision, the necessary precursor to finding our way.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
I’m going to invoke a couple of Holy Names here: who says you should read this book, besides me? E. O. Wilson. Bill McKibben. Both put their stamp of approval on the back cover, very official.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
Ecologist <a href="https://new.oberlin.edu/arts-and-sciences/departments/environment/faculty_detail.dot?id=59807"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(4, 46, 238); color: #021eaa;">Carl McDaniel</span></a> has done something beautifully Scientific in his book <a href="https://sigelpress.com/product/at-the-mercy-of-nature/"><i>At The Mercy Of Nature: Shackleton’s Survival Saga Gives Promise For Our Future</i>.</a> </div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
He set out to methodically search for the right question, then see what he could pull out of History that might refine the question further. Many great scientists have stated some version of "First find the right question." McDaniel's methods here are in the best scientific tradition.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
"Do we have historical examples of humans in groups surviving against unknown challenges, and extreme trials?" - is my own phrasing of how this investigation was launched. Because that is what ecologists know our species is facing - extreme conditions and unknown problems.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="color: #021eaa; text-decoration: underline;"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Trans-Antarctic_Expedition">Ernest Shackleton's expedition's survival</a></span> of Antarctic shipwreck in 1914 is an astonishing story which was copiously documented by photographs and daily journals. The basics- their ship, a 3 masted sailing vessel with an early coal fueled engine, became locked in ice far from land, and the crew of 28 picked men found themselves trapped, their ship crushed and sunk. In the era before radio, let alone GPS. No one knew where they were, no rescuers would come. Their story has been made into many books and multiple movies, and the storytellers are not done with it yet, I'm sure. I won't be spoiling anything by telling you - all 28 men survived- and they finally managed their own rescue in 1917 - after years utterly alone in the Antarctic.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
McDaniel re-tells the story as part of his analysis, it's mind-boggling. You only have to get a few months into the events after the <i><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endurance_(1912_ship)">Endurance</a></i> became caught in the ice to realize- people in this expedition should have started dying immediately. Catastrophe after deadly catastrophe caught them- in my own reading, it's amazing any of them survived more than 6 months. But they all survived.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
Unlike the many re-tellings that are purely hero-worship (quite deserved); McDaniel asks "How? Why" and "What/" and manages to pull multiple answers no one else has ever extracted from the story. And convinces, with evidence.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
You need to have the list of factors that allowed Shackleton's crew to survive - in your back pocket. Look at it often. Use it. They survived, when they should not have.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
Of course- you have to read the book, to get the list. If you don't have McDaniel's accompanying commentary, the list will mean nothing to you.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-size: 16px;">
Read it. Pass it on. It's a tool; one you'll need.<br />
<br /></div>
Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-58345303875218386812016-03-05T11:54:00.000-06:002016-03-05T11:54:59.011-06:00For example-I'm going to paste in the entire text of a post on the Japanese news feed I've mentioned before. It's a perfect example of the excellent studies they continue to publish - which will rapidly disappear.<br />
<br />
There's a good chance this will never appear in international news sources; and I'd predict with near certainty that it will not reappear in Japanese internal news; past today. The controllers can't pretend it never was published; but they can enforce "oh, it's trivial; drop it."<br />
<br />
Summary; 3,400 people who survived the tsunami and nuclear meltdown - are now dead; from "prolonged upheaval." They're just reporting the facts. Lots of facts here; but you have to put them together yourself. The link is likely to stop working today- but it works right now.<br />
<br />
--------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20160305_20/">3,400 survivors of 2011 disaster have since died</a><br />
<br />
The Japanese government says more than 3,400 survivors of the 2011 earthquake and tsunami have subsequently died due to health problems caused by prolonged upheaval.<br />
<br />
The Reconstruction Agency compiles data every 6 months on deaths related to the disaster and the ensuing nuclear accident in northeastern Japan.<br />
<br />
Agency officials say that by the end of last September, 4-and-a-half years after the disaster, they had documented 3,407 deaths.<br />
<br />
The largest number was in Fukushima Prefecture, where the damaged nuclear plant is based -- 1,979 residents, representing 58 percent of the total.<br />
<br />
The officials say 1,876 people or 55 percent died within 3 months of the disaster.<br />
<br />
Since March 2014, 156 people have died, most of them in Fukushima Prefecture.<br />
<br />
The officials say that as of February 12th, as many as 174,471 people are still in temporary housing or living in relatives' homes. The figure is down 50,706 from last March.<br />
<br />
156,234 people are living in prefabricated housing or apartments rented by central and local governments. 18,237 people live with their relatives and acquaintances, down 316 from last year.<br />
<br />
43,139 people originally from Fukushima Prefecture are living different prefectures.<br />
<br />
Local governments have completed only half the planned public housing for people affected by the disaster, and just 30 percent of residential developments on land lots in higher locations.<br />
<br />
Some communities continue to suffer from declining populations.<br />
<br />
In Miyagi, Iwate and Fukushima prefectures, 12 communities have reported population declines of more than 10 percent. More than half said their numbers are down by 20 percent or greater.<br />
<br />
-------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
End quote. Disasters cause long, slow declines - in civilization itself, now. The entire story of the Fukushima disaster is incredibly complex; but included the immediate descent of sophisticated vultures anxious to steal public disaster relief funds. And they have.<br />
<br />
This is not fun to watch; but is incredibly educational; and could save your family's life someday.<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703718837080088488.post-17694265011828580172016-02-28T14:14:00.001-06:002016-02-28T14:17:13.251-06:00Keep your eyes on JapanHi folks- I'm still here, and still very much want this blog to keep going. I appreciate your sticking with me.<br />
<br />
As I've mentioned in the past couple years, it has become a problem for me to find a topic I can write about without being depressing- when I don't think either you or I need that.<br />
<br />
But now that it's no longer a question of "is climate change happening", nor "are world politics getting entirely out of hand" - I find it's actually a little easier to focus on what to say.<br />
<br />
I want - if possible - to be one of those who survive. As a lifelong student of evolution, opting out of survival is how you certainly "lose the game." If there's a game. If you can win or lose. <br />
<br />
And I hope to bring family and community through, too. Now the question is "how?" Because there are no roadmaps; our species and planet are moving into completely unknown territory; we truly do not know what happens next. <br />
<br />
One thing I know for certain today (I know something for certain! How cool is that!) is that most of the world events generating headlines do not come from "new" phenomena, though they are virtually always spun that way by the sophomores in charge of the press. Income disparity? Has existed in all societies, in all eras back to Babylon and Sumer - literally. And has always caused injustice, pain, and slaughter. Slavery? Same. Corrupt officials/police? Same. Schools not teaching what students need? You can find that complaint on clay tablets in cuneiform - really. Unwelcome, unstoppable, migrants? Ever heard of Romans? Hittites/ Mongols/ Europeans? War/ Genocide? It goes on. Even climate change and sea level rise; take a look at <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doggerland">Doggerland</a>, called "Britain's Atlantis" in the popular press. That happened so far back we remember as myth- although Australian Aborigines have re-told the story for 10,000 years <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ancient-sea-rise-tale-told-accurately-for-10-000-years/">without losing accuracy</a>.<br />
<br />
The point. The point is that history, available to us all, contains myriad examples we should be learning from. Mostly, of course humans refuse to learn from history. I have 2 favorite quotes on that point, the first from Aldous Huxley, "That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons that history has to teach." Stolen from many sources, usually less wordy, into antiquity. And a currently popular version, cheerfully sent to me via Facebook, from Spice: "Some of us can learn from other people's mistakes; but most of us just have to piss on the electric fence." That was stolen from Will Rogers, the earliest wise man with electric fence available for metaphors.<br />
<br />
All of history, now that "the google" is here, is at your fingertips. It's fascinating, highly educational, and tremendously entertaining. Particularly all the mutually incompossible versions. I recommend it. <br />
<br />
Which finally brings us to Japan.<br />
<br />
Japan is unique among "developed" nations, in many ways; but most importantly: A) It is an island- which I pointed out <a href="http://littlebloginthebigwoods.blogspot.com/2008/05/islands-first.html">years back</a> would be the first places to be forced to change. B) It was the top economy on the planet- 20 years ago, and is in decline now. C) Achieved the highest "standard of living" for the largest percentage of population ever. D) Is losing population, around 1 million in the past 5 years. And E) Emerged so recently and directly from feudalism that the people still actively remember most of their pre-industrial culture. Oh, and lived through "The Atomic Age" - and are now struggling to leave it behind.<br />
<br />
Japan is 10-30 years ahead of the curve for the rest of the industrialized countries, in politics and economics and every other aspect of our species I can identify. They've been there, done that, got the t-shirt, and have worn the t-shirt into rags.<br />
<br />
The populace is still stunningly wealthy by world standards; but the future is frightening, downhill tracks are everywhere. Old and young are worried and depressed to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_Japan">the point of suicide</a> and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/21/loveplus-video-game_n_4588612.html">craziness</a>.<br />
<br />
We can see all those problems and tendencies in our own backyards. But Japan is out in front. If you want some hint of what is likely coming to the communities near you - <a href="http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/english/news/">watch Japan</a>.<br />
<br />
Remember it is what is written between the lines that is most important. Always.<br />
<br />
And keep the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9DvOq0VZ-4">incredible</a> variety of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_1qyVURScc">wildly</a> enthusiastic <a href="http://www.tokyoweekender.com/2014/12/festivals-of-ice-and-fire-akitas-winter-celebrations/">Japanese</a> festivals in <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2fi6Gcxqy0">mind</a>. They don't know what the future holds - so -<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-15f81dOtqD0/VtNQtiR2xuI/AAAAAAAAAaE/SzsERkllHT0/s1600/mini-kamakura.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-15f81dOtqD0/VtNQtiR2xuI/AAAAAAAAAaE/SzsERkllHT0/s640/mini-kamakura.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
I do like the metaphors available in that photo. It's dark, and it's cold. But there are lights, with some warmth. And people - tending them. And these lights are facing in all different directions.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Greenpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17224906349154302210noreply@blogger.com5