One useful aspect to all of us forcibly attending Camp TEOTWAWKI now, is that many people truly are starting to be more mindful of their choices. Think before you invest. Look before you leap off your burning bridges. That sort of thing.
Guidance in making long term decisions though, is hard to come by, and harder to judge. Does this expert advisor actually have a clue, or ... have I wound up with
Alfred E. Neuman, yet again?
Not long after Spouse and I built the Little House, and actually started living here, it became quite clear that we needed more space. 15' x 20'; including a wood stove, piano, and kitchen sink, and dining room table, just does not leave a lot of room for projects, like building a set of shelves. No place left to walk, while that is under way.
Virtually all farm type operations include outbuildings; a barn, a shed- a workshop. So it wasn't too difficult to decide that we did, indeed, need a multipurpose shed, not too far from the house. We figured it should serve as a: work shop, bad-weather wood shed, seasonal storage space (eg. storm windows and skis in summer), materials storage (eg. boards, plywood), tool storage, empty mason jar storage. You know. A shed.
So quickly, you get to "where, exactly"; "how big", and "how". "Where" was pretty limited; by the need to be close; "how big", it turns out, was partly determined by "how".
Standard construction around here would be a "pole barn" - treated wood poles, gravel or concrete floor, pre-fab roof trusses, and sheet metal sides and roof. You just go the lumber yard, and order the stuff. And there are loads of experienced construction teams who can zip it up for you in a couple days.
It was very easy to decide not to go that route- we had no money whatsoever. Which meant- materials out of our 40 acres of oak/maple woods, and/or scrounged materials, and a "barn-raising" party for labor.
Then, you have to work out the details.
Something you pretty quickly find out, when you're living this kind of do-it-yourself life; the details are NOT "important". The details are EVERYTHING.
Oddly, we teach our children the opposite, these days. "Sure, teacher, I got the answer to the question wrong, but you can tell I understood it!" - will often get you a pity-pass in schools, even in universities. But not in real life. My father pounded this one in when he was an engineering prof, and I was in High School; and I got to listen to him gripe about his students.
"But Professor, yes, I got the math wrong, but it's just a decimal point! You can tell I totally understood the problem!" "I don't give a good goddam if you 'understood' the problem! Your goddam building FELL DOWN; and 370 people died!! The only thing that matters is the right answer. The F stands. " And he would shake his head in amazement at their incomprehension.
So, I was well trained to do my homework regarding construction, and I'd adsorbed quite a bit of information via osmosis- and from helping my father re-build most of the houses we'd lived in (many). Looking around at the old homesteads here, I found quite a few old chicken coops and corn cribs that were made with just white oak posts for their basic support; planted in the ground; and easily 50 years old. Obviously, white oak can last a long time in our soils; the stated lifespan for chemically treated poles in direct soil contact is usually 30-40 years.
Doing more homework- the expected lifespan for white oak fenceposts around here is less; 20-30 years. The difference is attributed mostly to the roof- poles under a roof should spend more of their life dry.
Most of my available poles are not exactly "white oak" - Quercus alba; but burr oak; Q. macrocarpa. The textbooks say, though, that in this case, they're pretty much the same in regard to rot resistance.
So, using my own oak poles, we should be able to put up a shed that will last 30 years; no sweat. We had a good supply of 12"-8" diameter red pine poles for rafters and plates; pine boards and 2/4's for other structure- and we helped a friend tear down a local railroad station for windows and siding. We did buy metal for the roof.
When you're 30 years old- 30 years into the future looks indistinguishable from "forever", or "until we die." And, guess what? It isn't. Here I am- 30 odd years later-
And sure as heck; the time has run out on some of my burr oak poles.
This is the SW corner pole. And, as you can see- it's entirely rotted off- the bottom of the pole is now a good 6" above the ground. Hm.
We just discovered it, absurdly enough. The shed had gone through a phase where it got increasingly cluttered and useless, to the point where I only referred to it as "The Dread Shed"; and it got to the point where Middle Child and his wife decided to totally overhaul it, bless them. Unburying the corner- where we already knew a woodchuck had chewed through the outer wall (and wrought havoc inside for months); we discovered the rotted off pole. Oh, so that's why the windows have been breaking.
The shed is not falling down. One of the advantages of using big logs for plates and rafters- they're enormously strong, and well secured on the other poles- most of which are not rotted off. This corner is the wettest one. But- the building is sagging, putting stress on everything.
So now what? Fix it? Tear the shed down and rebuild? I don't want to.
Dammit, I'm 60 years old now, busy, and I want the bloody shed to be in usable shape; I don't want to be building, or fixing.
Why didn't I build it to last in the first place?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That turns out to be a complex, and highly significant question. Lissen up; and maybe you can avoid my mistakes.
A) I was young (30) and stupid. I thought 30 years was forever. It really really isn't.
B) Everybody I asked thought 30 years was forever, too. Or plenty long enough.
C) The entire construction industry is built around the idea that structures should not last more than 50 years; even homes. Then you should build a new one. You want to benefit from the constant improvements in modern materials and design, don't you? Well then. They really like that- so if you read their text books, or go to them for advice- that's what they'll tell you.
and
D) Building structures with longer life-spans is quite a lot more expensive. Like double.
E) Financial advice is always- that investments in durable structures are not sensible. The reasoning there: if you put that money in the stock market instead, it would give you better returns (no laughing, now); and, they're quite sure you will move to a better, more expensive location later in life, as you become more successful; so you won't get the benefit of the more durable structure anyway; and whoever you sell your old place to will not pay you any premiums for the better buildings; people just don't.
F) That's the way we build stuff in the States- always have. Ever since Europeans arrived here- they've been sure they were going to move in the next 10-20 years, to someplace better. Why build for the long term?
See any holes in any of the logic here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm cogitating, pondering, and kneading all this stuff right now for a couple of specific reasons; I've got to figure out what to do about this shed; and- about future construction here. We're in the process of building space for animals (guineas! ) - and you can check out a recent rhapsody on barns by Sharon,
here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More in the next post. Think about it! And think about all the stone farmhouses in Europe... and how old they are...